District Court of Appeal of Florida September 4, 1984, No. 84-7 (Breslin v. State)

lead-opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the adjudication of criminal contempt entered against a criminal defense lawyer as a result of grossly improper remarks made and repeated during a trial despite specific warnings to the contrary given by the trial judge to the attorney both in a previous proceeding and in the instant one. Ward v. State, 354 So.2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Kleinfeld v.