Michigan Supreme Court January 15, 1985, Docket Nos. 71647, 72852. (Calendar Nos. 9, 10) (Miller v. C a Muer Corp.)

Levin, J.

In these cases, consolidated on appeal, the defendant employers promulgated antinepotism policies applicable to the employment of rela

*358

tives, including spouses.

1

The principal question is whether the policies impermissibly discriminate on the basis of "marital status” within the meaning of § 202 of the Michigan civil rights act.