Supreme Court of New Jersey April 10, 1985 (Wolfsbruck v. Dow Chemical Co.)
Also known as
United States · · · 10-04-1985
This appeal being before the Court under
Rule
2:2-l(a) by virtue of a dissent in the Appellate Division, and the Court having considered the oral arguments and the briefs of the parties; and the Court having determined that a remand of this matter is appropriate for the following reasons,
(1) the issues posed by this appeal are similar to those raised in
Salomon v. Eli Lilly and Co.,
98
N.J.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit