District of Columbia Court of Appeals January 10, 1985, No. 84-279 (Providence Hospital v. Group Hospitalization, Inc.)

PER CURIAM:

Providence appeals after Group Hospitalization, Inc. (GHI) was granted summary judgment on their cross motions. They contend that the benefit reimbursement provision contained in their provider contract with GHI should be “interpreted” by the court.

The wording of the provision is clear and unambiguous; thus it need not be redefined or interpreted. See 1 A.