District Court of Appeal of Florida December 18, 1985, No. 85-766 (Daniel v. American Cyanamid Co.)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Under the facts of this case we do not conclude that the trial court erred in finding that appellee’s land should be classified as agricultural for ad valorem tax purposes. It was undisputed that the land was being used agriculturally, albeit under lease. See Fisher v. Schooley, 371 So.2d 496 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).