Washington Supreme Court February 7, 1985, 50748-1 (Grange Insurance v. MacKenzie)
Also known as
United States · · · 07-02-1985
Dore, J.
(dissenting) — The majority holds as a matter of law that the car was furnished for the regular use of petitioner. Because this holding is based solely on the petitioner being contemplated as the only driver of the car and his operation of the vehicle 4 to 6 times a month, I dissent.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit