Court of Appeals of Alaska September 27, 1985, A-550 (Browning v. State)

Also known as

United States · · · 27-09-1985

SINGLETON, Judge,

dissenting.

Whether to grant or deny a motion for mistrial is a matter committed to the trial court’s sound discretion. Lewis v. State, 452 P.2d 892 (Alaska 1969), Roth v. State, 626 P.2d 583 (Alaska App.1981). Where the state moves for mistrial and the defendant opposes the motion, the trial court must find “manifest necessity” before granting the mistrial. Lewis, 452 P.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.