California Supreme Court December 31, 1985, Crim. 22357 (People v. Silbertson)
Also known as
United States · · · 31-12-1985
MOSK, J.
I concur in affirming the judgment as to guilt, but dissent from reversal of the special circumstance finding.
*308I
The majority go astray at the outset of their analysis by assuming that “The only possible exception” to the Carlos rule of reversal “which might possibly apply” is the so-called Cantrell-Thomton exception. (Ante, p. 306.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit