Mississippi Supreme Court June 5, 1985, 55586 (Donald v. State)

I think the evidence of other forgeries (uttering) admitted by the lower court in this case to prove identity of William Donald was properly admitted and did not constitute reversible error. The same question was presented in Tobias v. State,472 So.2d 398 (Miss. 1985), and held to be reversible error. I adopt my dissent in Tobias, supra, as the dissent in this case. WALKER, P.J.