Court of Appeals of Minnesota October 14, 1986, C8-86-583 (Miller v. Anderson)
Also known as
United States · · · 14-10-1986
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
This appeal raises the question whether a lender is entitled to summary judgment on notes given for money lent for the renovation of residential property, where the lender has already cancelled the borrower’s contract for the purchase of the same property. The trial court entered judgment against appellants due to their default on two promissory notes.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit