Court of Appeals of Minnesota April 15, 1986, C1-85-2231 (Strangis v. Metropolitan Bank)

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a trial court order granting respondents’ motion for temporary injunction and a second order denying appellant’s motion for increased bond. Appellant claims (1) temporary injunction was not appropriate because an adequate legal remedy exists, and (2) increased bond is necessary because appellant is under-collat-eralized. We affirm.