District of Columbia Court of Appeals September 2, 1986, 84-1758 (Tilghman v. Johnson)

PER CURIAM.

This appeal comes from a directed verdict for defendant at the end of plaintiff’s case in a suit for damages arising from an automobile collision. Appellant argues that the grant of the motion was improper because appellant was not, as the court held, contributorily negligent as a matter of law. We agree and reverse.