Ohio Court of Appeals September 28, 1987, CA 2301 (State v. Hines)

Kerns, P.J.,

dissenting. From the standpoint of criminal design and purpose, both of the crimes charged against the defendant involved a single animus and identical conduct, and the overlapping evidence shows that the same conduct by Hines could be construed “to constitute two or more allied offenses of similar import.” R.C. 2941.25(A).