Court of Appeals of Texas August 6, 1987, No. 2-86-210-CR (Scott v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 06-08-1987
BURDOCK, Justice,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent.
The majority opinion reflects there was no direct testimony that Scott stole any property or intentionally assisted in the theft of the property. In its holding, the majority dismisses as insignificant eyewitness testimony that Scott handed a female merchandise which was later found in her purse.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit