Court of Appeals of Oregon September 30, 1987, 27646; CA A37830 (Johnson v. Overbay)

NEWMAN, J.

In our previous opinion, we stated that “[t]he dispute here concerns only the 60 acres that the addendum deleted.” 85 Or App at 578. Defendant Marilyn Overbay’s motion and petition for reconsideration assert that we should have addressed her contention that the interlocutory judgment of foreclosure is void, because the court lacked personal jurisdiction over her when it granted it.