District Court, N.D. California September 25, 1987, Nos. C-83-6251-RCB, C-83-6260-RCB, C-83-6263-RCB, C-83-6267-RCB, C-83-6316-RCB, C-83-6330-RCB, C-83-6363-RCB, C-83-6391-RCB, C-83-6462-RCB, C-83-6483-RCB, C-87-2847-RCB, C-87-2848-RCB to C-87-2850-RCB, C-87-2852-RCB to C-87-2857-RCB, C-87-2859-RCB to C-87-2861-RCB, C-87-2863-RCB, C-87-2864-RCB, C-87-2866RCB, C-87-2867-RCB, C-87-2875-RCB to C-87-2877-RCB, C-87-2879-RCB to C-87-2892-RCB, C-87-2894-RCB and C-87-2958-RCB to C-87-2962-RCB (In re Gerry)
Also known as
United States · · · 25-09-1987
OPINION
BELLONI, District Judge.
A court trial was held on September 4, 1987 to determine whether the plaintiffs in the above captioned cases and the defendant Raymark Industries, Inc., (Ray-mark) had compromised and settled all 49 cases. I heard the witnesses called by the plaintiffs and Raymark and with the consent of the parties I considered 10 affidavits1.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit