Court of Appeals of Minnesota May 3, 1988, C4-88-4 (Reed v. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Golden Valley, District 5)

OPINION

HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Acting Judge.

A Commissioner’s representative from the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training determined that respondent employee, who had engaged in off-duty harassment of other employees, was not guilty of misconduct for unemployment compensation purposes. Concluding that respondent’s actions constituted misconduct as a matter of law, we reverse.