District Court of Appeal of Florida August 30, 1989, No. 88-2493 (O'Connor v. State)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions on Counts I and II. However, we reverse the sentence imposed on Count II because the trial court gave neither oral nor written reasons for its departure from the recommended guidelines sentence.

AFFIRMED AS TO COUNT I; REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RE-SENTENCING AS TO COUNT II.

DOWNEY, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.