New York Court of Appeals July 2, 1990 (Remba v. Federation Employment & Guidance Service)

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff maintains that she was discharged because she objected to, and refused to participate in, defendant’s purported fraudulent billing of New York City, and that such retaliatory action is prohibited under Labor Law § 740 (2) (c) (the “Whistleblower” Law).