Missouri Court of Appeals October 30, 1990, No. 57427 (Mitchell v. Briscoe)

Also known as

United States · · · 30-10-1990

GRIMM, Judge.

Plaintiffs petition for damages for legal malpractice was dismissed pursuant to defendant’s motion to dismiss.* Plaintiffs appeal pro se. Their appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 84.04.

Rule 84.04(c) requires that plaintiffs’ brief contain “a fair and concise statement of the facts relevant to the questions presented for determination without argument.” Rule 84.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.