Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit May 11, 1990, 89-2209 (United States v. Charles Richard Stumpf)

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

Charles R. Stumpf appeals from the district court’s denial of his Rule 35(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence, arguing that his sentence is illegal because it includes restitution as a condition of probation and he was not warned that restitution might be ordered if he pleaded guilty.