Massachusetts Appeals Court March 28, 1990, No. 89-P-279 (Ruggiero v. Costa)
Also known as
United States · · · 28-03-1990
In this action to recover for injuries from a dog-bite, the defendant’s answer included a defense that the plaintiff's claim was barred by reason of the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act. G. L. c. 152, §§ 23, 24.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit