Ohio Supreme Court May 9, 1990, No. 88-1940 (Stepak v. Schey)

Also known as

United States · · · 09-05-1990

H. Brown, J.,

dissenting. The majority construes the complaint as “merely asking for more money” and finds that it must be brought in an R.C. 1701.85 appraisal proceeding. That construction ignores the allegations in the complaint before us, which charge self-dealing and breach of fiduciary duty.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.