Ohio Supreme Court May 9, 1990, No. 88-1627 (State v. Huertas)

H. Brown, J.

For the reasons which follow, we affirm appellant’s conviction, but vacate the sentence of death and remand for imposition of a life sentence in accord with State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744.

I

Admission of Victim Impact Evidence

In his second proposition of law, appellant challenges the use of victim impact evidence at the penalty phase of his trial.