Ohio Supreme Court May 23, 1990, No. D.D. 88-30 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman)
Also known as
United States · · · 23-05-1990
Per Curiam.
Having thoroughly reviewed this record, we agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(6). We also agree with the board’s recommendation.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit