District Court of Appeal of Florida May 8, 1990, No. 89-517 (Can Am Investment Realty, Inc. v. Egan)

PER CURIAM.

The appellee concedes that, due to the ambiguity in the operative dates involved, the two counts of the Complaint which allege breach of contract were improperly dismissed. Accordingly, the dismissal of those two counts must be reversed, with those portions of the Complaint being remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.