Connecticut Appellate Court May 1, 1990, 7579 (Poprosky v. Shea)

Foti, J.

The plaintiffs in this quo warranto1 action appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court erred (1) in failing to find that the reform ordinance was not an illegal recall, (2) in basing its decision on another trial court decision, and (3) in finding that the restructuring ordinance was saved by permissible goals.