Court of Appeals of Oregon January 17, 1990, 10-86-07260; CA A46671 (State v. Brown)

RICHARDSON, J.,

concurring.

I agree with the majority that defendant’s statements and the evidence .seized from his vehicle were not obtained in violation of his federal or state constitutional rights. I write *213separately to discuss briefly the “Mirandization” of Article I, section 12.

The discussion revolves around State v. Magee, 304 Or 261, 744 P2d 250 (1987), and State v.