Utah Supreme Court July 7, 1992, 900485 (Trapp v. Salt Lake City Corp.)
Also known as
United States · · · 07-07-1992
DURHAM, Justice:
The sole issue for review is whether the trial court erred in holding on summary judgment that Salt Lake City did not owe plaintiff June Trapp a duty to maintain its sidewalk in a reasonably safe condition.
1
We reverse.
Salt Lake City argues that it has no duty because it had no special relationship to Trapp. In framing this argument, the City relies on
Christenson v.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit