Court of Appeals of Oregon February 12, 1992, 89-CR-0032; CA A63948 (State v. Tejeda)

PER CURIAM

Defendant’s probation was revoked, because he had been convicted of possession of cocaine in another case. See State v. Tejeda (A63949), 111 Or App 201, 826 P2d 25 (1992). He contends that he is not guilty of that charge and that, therefore, his probation was improperly revoked. He is wrong.

Affirmed.