Indiana Court of Appeals August 31, 1992, No. 49A02-9102-CV-58 (Indiana DLandowner's request for floodway construction permit was denied by the Natural Resources Commission (NRC), and landowner sought judicial review. The Marion Superior Court, James S. Kirsch, J., vacated NRC's order. NRC appealed. The Court of Appeals, Ratliff, C.J., held that: (1) landowner had burden of proving that no harm would come to fish, wildlife or botanical resources through its proposed construction (2) property was "floodway" within meaning of Indiana Flood Control Act and (8) landowner was not denied fundamental due process.epartment of Natural Resources v. United Refuse Co.)

Also known as

United States · · · 31-08-1992

RATLIFF®, Chief Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The Indiana Department of Natural Resources ("DNR"), through the Indiana Natural Resources Commission ("NRC"),3 appeals from a judgment vacating its order denying United Refuse Company, Inc.'s ("United") request for a floodway construction permit. We reverse and remand.

ISSUES

We restate the issues on appeal as:

1.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.