District Court of Appeal of Florida January 29, 1992, No. 91-2809 (Ford v. State)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends the trial court erred when it summarily denied his motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court stated in its order that it had attached “that portion of the files and records which con*1165clusively show that [appellant] is entitled to no relief.” The state concedes that the order in the record on appeal does not contain a copy of any attachments.

4 , , , .