District Court of Appeal of Florida January 31, 1992, No. 90-02873 (Silas v. State)

DANAHY, Judge.

The appellant challenges her convictions and sentences for grand theft and petit theft. We find no error with respect to her convictions and affirm.

The trial court placed the appellant on probation with respect to both offenses. We find no conflict between the terms of probation as announced at sentencing and the terms of probation set forth in the written order.