Ohio Supreme Court December 8, 1993, No. 92-1545 (Reynolds v. Physicians Insurance)
Also known as
United States · · · 08-12-1993
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
The sole issue is whether an implied contract of indemnity exists between two physicians, each physician having distinct and separate duties in caring for an infant patient. For the following reasons, we answer “no,” and accordingly, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit