Fairfax County Circuit Court November 22, 1993, Case No. (Criminal) 80916 (Commonwealth v. Bushnell)

By Judge Richard J. Jamborsky

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress.

Defendant argues that he was unconstitutionally seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment without the reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity defined in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).