District Court, D. Connecticut August 8, 1994, Civ. 3:94CV-29 (JAC) (Champagne v. Gintick)

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:

*

The question presented is whether the plaintiff, Samantha Champagne, a resident of Connecticut, will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction preventing the Hartford Police from enforcing Connecticut’s “stalking” law, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 53-181d,

1

against her.