Ohio Supreme Court December 23, 1994, No. 94-2005 (State v. Hull)
Also known as
United States · · · 23-12-1994
Per Curiam.
The motion to supplement the record is denied, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit