District Court of Appeal of Florida April 27, 1994, No. 93-0299 (Florida Drilling & Sawing v. Fohrman)
Also known as
United States · · · 27-04-1994
lead-opinion
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, plaintiff/eounter-defendant below, argues that the trial court erred in denying it attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to its demand for judgment and its offer of judgment. We affirm in part; reverse in part, and remand.
As plaintiff, appellant made a demand for judgment.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit