Montana Supreme Court October 6, 1994, 93-256 (State v. Ray)

JUSTICE TRIEWEILER

specially concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with the majoritys conclusion that the District Court abused its discretion when it admitted evidence of defendant’s conduct which occurred 16 to 18 years prior to trial. I also concur that based on that error alone, defendant is entitled to a new trial.