Court of Appeals of North Carolina June 20, 1995, 9429SC263 (Pitcock v. Fox)

Also known as

United States · · · 20-06-1995

EAGLES, Judge.

I.

Defendants argue that the trial court erred by denying defendants’ motion for directed verdict because the evidence was insufficient to show that plaintiffs acquired an easement by prescription.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.