Court of Appeals of North Carolina August 1, 1995, COA95-255 (State v. Lovett)
Also known as
United States · · · 01-08-1995
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Defendant first argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the blood test results. Specifically, defendant contends the chemical analyst did not give him a notice in writing of his rights in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-16.2 (1993). We disagree.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-16.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit