Court of Appeals of North Carolina August 1, 1995, COA95-255 (State v. Lovett)

Also known as

United States · · · 01-08-1995

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the blood test results. Specifically, defendant contends the chemical analyst did not give him a notice in writing of his rights in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-16.2 (1993). We disagree.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-16.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.