Supreme Court of Iowa October 25, 1995, 93-1556 (State v. Johnson)
Also known as
United States · · · 25-10-1995
McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.
In this further review case, the defendant, Roy Harold Johnson, convicted of indecent contact with a child, argues the district court erred in admitting during the State’s rebuttal case the alleged victim’s videotaped statement as a prior consistent statement under Iowa rule of evidence 801(d)(1)(B).
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit