District Court, District of Columbia June 27, 1995, Civ. A. 95-29 (CRR) (Pryor-El v. Kelly)
Also known as
United States · · · 27-06-1995
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court in the above-entitled case is the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative for Summary Judgment (“Defendants’ Motion”), and the Plaintiffs Opposition thereto. Upon careful consideration of the parties’ pleadings and the applicable law with respect thereto, the Court shall GRANT the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
I.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit