Supreme Court of Oklahoma September 25, 1995, 80048 (Thielenhaus v. Thielenhaus)

Also known as

United States · · · 25-09-1995

OPALA, Justice.

This certiorari presses for our decision two first-impression issues: (1) What portion, if any, of the in-marriage

1

increase in the hus

*928

band’s retirement fund is divisible as marital property? and if any be divisible, (2) What cut-off date should be set for valuation of this marital asset?

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.