Ohio Court of Appeals October 30, 1995, No. 68396. (Timber Ridge Investments Ltd. v. Marcus)

Karpinski, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in the majority’s disposition of the second assignment of error, but respectfully dissent from the first assignment of error for the following reason. The letter the landlord sent providing an option to terminate the lease clearly states that the tenants would be released from “all obligations under the lease.