Ohio Supreme Court July 26, 1995, No. 95-377 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Bancsi)
Also known as
United States · · · 26-07-1995
Per Curiam.
We have reviewed the record and concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommended sanction. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 9-102(A) and (B)(3), and 2-110(A)(2). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit