Ohio Supreme Court August 9, 1995, Nos. 95-546 and 95-547 (State ex rel. May v. Cissell)

*47The judgments of the court of appeals dismissing the complaints for writs of mandamus are affirmed on the basis that appellant possesses an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law to correct the trial court records via App.R. 9(E). See State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 587, 592, 639 N.E.2d 1189, 1194-1195, and cases cited therein.

Moyer, C.J.