District Court of Appeal of Florida July 19, 1995, No. 94-02630 (Gaines v. State)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence for robbery. We strike that portion of the condition of probation prohibiting excessive use of intoxicants because that requirement was not pronounced at sentencing. See Tomlinson v. State, 645 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We further strike the imposition of $33 for a “cost/fine,” $2 pursuant to section 943.