District Court of Appeal of Florida August 11, 1995, No. 94-03127 (Jennings v. State)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his convictions for two counts of sexual battery, alleging the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss based on the destruction of evidence. We affirm his convictions since we find no error in the court’s ruling on this issue, but we strike two special conditions of probation that were not orally pronounced at sentencing.