District Court of Appeal of Florida September 8, 1995, No. 94-2661 (Henderson v. Mickelson)

PER CURIAM.-

AFFIRMED. The findings and decision of the trial court are presumed correct, and Henderson, as the appellant, had the burden of demonstrating error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Although there is no record of the trial proceeding, Henderson could have availed himself of rule 9.